BP 4119.1/4219.1/4319.1 — Civil and Legal Rights
Section: 4000 - Personnel
Status: Active
Adopted: 2021-11-18
Revised: 2022-12-15
Policy text
CIVIL AND LEGAL RIGHTS
The Governing Board believes that the personal life of an employee is not an appropriate concern of the district, except as it may directly relate to the employee’s performance of their duties.
District employees may engage in private, personal activities, including the exercise of their religious, political, cultural, social, or other beliefs or activities, during personal time including when they are not on duty or engaged in the supervision or instruction of students.
The district shall make no inquiry concerning the personal values, attitudes, and beliefs of district employees or their sexual orientation or political or religious affiliations, beliefs, or opinions except when authorized by law. In addition, no district employee shall be required to provide critical appraisals of other individuals with whom the employee has a familial relationship. However, the district reserves the right to access any publicly available information about any employee.
No employee shall be dismissed, suspended, disciplined, reassigned, transferred, or otherwise retaliated against solely for acting to protect a student engaged in conduct authorized under Education Code 48907 or 48950.
When necessary to protect the health, welfare, or safety of students and staff, school officials may search district property under an employee’s control.
Whistleblower Protection
An employee shall have the right to disclose to a Board member, a school administrator, a member of the County Board of Education, County Superintendent of Schools, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction any improper governmental activity by the district or a district employee that violates state or federal law, is economically wasteful, or involves gross misconduct, incompetency, or inefficiency. When the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute or a violation of or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation, the employee has the right to disclose such information to a government or law enforcement agency or to refuse to participate in any such activity.
The Superintendent or designee shall prominently display in lettering larger than size 14 point type a list of employees’ rights and responsibilities under the whistleblower laws, including the telephone number of the whistleblower hotline maintained by the office of the California Attorney General.
No employee shall use or attempt to use their official authority or influence to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or command or attempt to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or command, another employee for the purpose of interfering with that employee’s right to disclose the improper governmental activity.
An employee who has disclosed improper governmental activity and believes that they have subsequently been subjected to acts or attempted acts of reprisal shall file a written complaint in accordance with the district’s complaint procedures. After filing a complaint with the district, the employee may also file a copy of the complaint with local law enforcement and/or seek civil law remedies against the supervisor or administrator who retaliated or attempted to retaliate against them, in accordance with Education Code 44114.
Protection Against Liability
No employee shall be liable for harm caused by the employee’s act or omission when acting within the scope of employment or district responsibilities; the employee’s act or omission is in conformity with federal or state law, district policy, or administrative regulation; and the employee’s act or omission is in furtherance of an effort to control, discipline, expel, or suspend a student or to maintain order or control in the classroom or school.
The protection against liability shall not apply when:
- The employee acted with willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence, recklessness, or conscious, flagrant indifference to rights or safety of the individual harmed.
- The employee caused harm by operating a motor vehicle or other vehicle requiring license or insurance.
- The employee was not properly licensed, if required, by state law for such activities.
- The employee was found by a court to have violated a federal or state civil rights law.
- The employee was under the influence of alcohol or any drug at the time of the misconduct.
- The misconduct constituted a crime of violence pursuant to 18 USC 16 or an act of terrorism for which the employee has been convicted in court.
- The misconduct involved a sexual offense for which the employee has been convicted in court.
- The misconduct occurred during background investigations, or other actions, involved in the employee’s hiring.
Legal
EDUCATION CODE
Ed. Code 200-262.4 Educational equity; prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex
Ed. Code 44040 Discrimination based on employee’s appearance before certain boards or committees
Ed. Code 44110-44114 Reporting by school employees of improper governmental activity
Ed. Code 48907 Exercise of free expression; rules and regulations
Ed. Code 48950 Speech and other communication
Ed. Code 49091.24 Teacher rights to refuse evaluation/survey of personal life
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
18 USC 16 Crime of violence defined
20 USC 1681-1688 Title IX, 1972 Education Act Amendments
20 USC 7941-7948 Teacher liability protection
42 USC 12101-12213 Americans with Disabilities Act
42 USC 2000d-2000d-7 Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
Gov. Code 12650-12656 False claims actions
Gov. Code 12940-12951 (to 12953) Discrimination prohibited; unlawful practices
Gov. Code 3540.1 Public employment definitions
Gov. Code 3543.5 Interference with employee’s rights prohibited
Gov. Code 815.3 Intentional torts
Gov. Code 820-823 Tort claims act
Gov. Code 825.6 Indemnification of public entity
LABOR CODE
Lab. Code 1102.5-1106 Whistleblower protections
COURT DECISIONS
New Jersey v. T.L.O., (1985) 469 U.S. 325
O’Conner v. Ortega, (1987) 480 U.S. 709
Runyon v Board of Trustees of CA 2010 48 Cal 4th 760
Garcetti v. Ceballos, (2006) 543 U.S. 1186
Hartnett v. Crosier, (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 685
Johnson v. Poway Unified School District, (2011) 658 F.3d 954