BP 4119.11/4219.11/4319.11 — Sexual Discrimination and Sex-Based Harassment
Section: 4000 - Personnel
Status: Active
Adopted: 2015-05-12
Revised: 2025-12-11
Policy text
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
The district does not discriminate on the basis of sex in any of its programs or activities and complies with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and its implementing regulations.
The Governing Board is committed to providing a safe work environment that is free of discrimination, harassment, and intimidation, including sexual harassment. The Board prohibits sexual harassment, as defined in the accompanying administrative regulation, in district programs and activities by and against district employees. For purposes of this policy and accompanying administrative regulation, employees include interns, volunteers, contractors, job applicants, and other persons with an employment relationship with the district.
Additionally, the Board prohibits retaliatory behavior or action against any person who complains or testifies about conduct that reasonably may constitute sexual harassment, reports such conduct, or otherwise participates or refuses to participate in the complaint process established for the purpose of this policy.
The Superintendent or designee shall take all actions necessary to ensure the prevention, investigation, and correction of sexual harassment, including but not limited to:
- Providing training to employees in accordance with law and administrative regulation
- Publicizing and disseminating the district’s sexual harassment policy to employees and others to whom the policy may apply
- Publicizing, as specified in Exhibit (1) 4119.12/4219.12/4319.12 – Title IX Sexual Harassment Complaint Procedures, the required notifications related to Title IX to employees, applicants for employment, and bargaining units
- Ensuring prompt, thorough, fair, and equitable investigation of complaints through the appropriate state and/or federal procedures
- Taking timely and appropriate corrective/remedial action(s)
The Superintendent or designee may periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the district’s strategies to prevent and address sexual harassment. Such evaluation may involve conducting regular anonymous employee surveys to assess whether sexual harassment is occurring or is perceived to be tolerated, partnering with researchers or other agencies with the needed expertise to evaluate the district’s prevention strategies, and using any other effective tool for receiving feedback on systems and/or processes. As necessary, changes shall be made to harassment policy(ies), complaint procedures, or training, as appropriate and in accordance with law.
Reports and Complaints
Any district employee who has experienced sexual harassment in the district’s education program or activity may file a complaint with the district’s Title IX Coordinator.
Any employee with knowledge of conduct that reasonably may constitute sexual harassment by or against another district employee, a student, or a third party in a district education program or activity shall notify the Title IX Coordinator as soon as reasonably possible. An employee may be subject to discipline for failure to timely report such conduct.
Once notified, the Title IX Coordinator shall ensure that the complaint alleging sexual harassment is addressed through Administrative Regulation 4119.12/4219.12/4319.12 - Title IX Sexual Harassment Complaint Procedures or Administrative Regulation 4030 - Nondiscrimination in Employment, as applicable. Additionally, the Title IX Coordinator shall ensure that any implementation of Administrative Regulation 4119.12/4219.12/4319.12 - Title IX Sexual Harassment Complaint Procedures concurrently meets the requirements of Administrative Regulation 4030 - Nondiscrimination in Employment.
Before or after the filing of a formal complaint or where no formal complaint has been filed, the Title IX Coordinator shall offer and coordinate supportive measures to be provided to the complainant and respondent, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances.
Upon investigation of a sexual harassment complaint, any district employee found to have engaged or participated in sexual harassment or to have aided, abetted, incited, compelled, or coerced another to commit sexual harassment in violation of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, in accordance with law and the applicable collective bargaining agreement.
Prior Revised Dates
10/15/2025, 10/10/2024, 11//18/2021, 4/22/2021, 9/25/2018, 11/14/2017, 5/12/2015
Legal
EDUCATION CODE
200-262.4 Prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex
220.1 Prohibition of retaliation related to educational equity
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
20 USC 1681-1688 Title IX prohibition against discrimination
34 CFR 106.1-106.9 Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities
42 USC 2000gg-2000gg-6 Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
42 USC 2000e-2000e-17 Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended%20(,religion%2C%20sex%20and%20national%20origin.)
GOVERNMENT CODE
12900-12996 Fair Employment and Housing Act, especially:
12940 Prohibited discrimination
12950 Sexual harassment; distribution of information
12950.1 Sexual harassment training
STATE REGULATIONS
2 CCR 11006-11086 Discrimination in employment
2 CCR 11009 Principles of Employment Discrimination
2 CCR 11021 Discrimination in employment - retaliation
2 CCR 11023 Harassment and discrimination prevention and correction
2 CCR 11034 Terms, conditions, and privileges of employment
5 CCR 4900-4965 Nondiscrimination in elementary and secondary education programs
LABOR CODE
Lab. Code 1101 Political activities of employees
Lab. Code 1102.1 Discrimination: sexual orientation
Lab. Code 1197.5 Wages, hours, and working conditions
COURT DECISIONS
Burlington Industries v. Ellreth, (1998) 118 S.Ct. 2257
Department of Health Services v. Superior Court of California, (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1026
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, (1998) 118 S.Ct. 2275
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, (1998) 118 S.Ct. 1989
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson et al., (1986) 447 U.S. 57
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv. Inc., (1998) 118 S.Ct. 998