Skip to content
LBUSD Timeline

Judge Denies Request to Relocate Laguna Beach High School Graduation Ceremony

Laguna Beach Unified School District · Laguna Beach Unified School District (press release)

Author
Published:
2026-06-05
Retrieved:
2026-06-08

District press release distributed via Spotlight Schools — NOT the court order itself. Announces that on June 5, 2026 U.S. District Judge Fred W. Slaughter denied the plaintiffs' TRO application in Breit v. LBUSD (No. 8:26-cv-01418), allowing the June 11 graduation to proceed at the Irvine Bowl. CAVEAT: the quoted findings are the prevailing party's rendering of the ruling, not the verbatim PACER order; pull the actual order for the court's own words. The denial is of emergency relief only — it does not reach the ADA / Section 504 / Gov't Code 11135 merits and is not a final judgment.

Key points

  • U.S. District Judge Fred W. Slaughter denied the TRO by order issued June 5, 2026; the June 11 graduation proceeds at the Irvine Bowl.
  • Per the district, the court found no likelihood of success on the merits, no irreparable harm, and the balance of equities not in plaintiffs' favor.
  • The court also found that relocating the entire ceremony less than a week out 'appeared broader than necessary to address the concerns raised.'
  • The district reported 265 graduation-family survey responses including 83 accommodation requests, incorporated into Irvine Bowl seating.
  • Denial of emergency relief does not reach the underlying ADA / Section 504 / Gov't Code 11135 claims.

Cited by 4 events

  1. The forecast 'hearing' was resolved by an order issued June 5, 2026 denying the TRO; graduation proceeds at the Irvine Bowl.

  2. The court found that plaintiffs did not make a sufficient showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, would suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the requested relief, or that the balance of equities weighed in their favor.

    Per the district's press release; the quoted findings are the district's rendering, not the verbatim court order.

  3. The district's opposition prevailed — the court denied the TRO on June 5, 2026.

  4. Outcome of the complaint's TRO request: denied June 5, 2026.